>Your intentions are honorable, but unsolicited posting of REXX Procedures is in
>bad form. All of us who use REXX consider most of our creations to be either
>beautiful or clever. If we all submitted them, there would be no time or room to
>answer questions on new and interesting problems. And believe me, the code
>snippets you provided are already in our arsenal, or could be written in moments.
>
>Warren
>http://www.borg.com/~warren
>
Warren,
I understand your feelings. I am not saying that I am such a fantastic programmer. Neither that my little snippets have "Inexpendible" written on them. Nevertheless, as I learn a lot from other folks from this list myself, I expect other people to have profit by my little creatures in turn. Another point is that is as with a paperclip: it is so simple, but somebody *had* to invent it. So I expect that my previous 3 examples are not in all's arsenal.
However if you could suggest a better alternative for sharing "cleverness", please do so.
Note: REXXBEAUTIES as a heading, gives you instant insight to read or skip.
Unless there are serious complaints about poluting this list, I would suggest that anyone may feel free to join or not to join.
